Blaming the victim on piracy?
There’s a great debate about movie piracy going on over at WaPo’s “The Switch,” kicked off by the launch of a new web site – PiracyData.org – by our friends at the Mercatus Center. The Mercatus site is headlined by the following question: “Do people turn to piracy when the movies they want to watch are not available legally?”
The implication is that piracy of movies that aren’t being offered legally is OK, or at least less bad, than piracy of movies that are currently available.
This is a complex issue – too complex to cover all the angles in a brief blog post. But I want to focus on one question: If you believe copyright holders have an obligation to make all content available to everyone all the time (as PiracyData.org seems to suggest), at what price would you require them to offer it? Should it be based on cost, or will you permit price discrimination – i.e., pricing based on intensity of demand? Either way, who will set these prices, and what economic models will be used to ensure they are welfare maximizing?
The reality of the movie business is that content is released and re-released, taken off the market and put back on — “windowed” as they call it – in order to efficiently price discriminate, i.e., to make content available at something close to marginal cost to some customers, some of the time, while charging others – those with higher willingness to pay – prices high enough to defray part of the sunk cost investment. It’s simply another form of the efficient, competitive price discrimination engaged in by ISPs. And, if it’s OK for Comcast – as I suspect most of the folks at Mercatus agree – it ought to be OK for the movie labels too.
Leave a reply
Sign Up For More
Research & Events
- Innovators versus litigators: Chairman Bob Goodlatte on the need for patent reformOctober 24, 2013 12:45 pm
- Sorting out patent reform proposals in the 113th CongressOctober 23, 2013 1:38 pm
- Trolling for a patent policy fixSeptember 16, 2013 12:43 pm
- Sorting out the high-tech patent messSeptember 13, 2013 7:34 pm
- Innovators versus litigators: Chairman Bob Goodlatte on the need for patent reform
- PaeDae Raises $11.6M, Looks Beyond Mobile Rewards To “User-Centric Advertising”Source: Tech Crunch | December 10, 2013
- Simulmedia's Investors Bet $25 Million More on Smart TV Ads (Video)Source: All Things D | December 10, 2013
- Evernote’s Market For Physical Goods Now Accounts For 30% Of Its Monthly SalesSource: Tech Crunch | December 10, 2013
- Fred Wilson On Bitcoin, Unbundling, Data Leakage And Health CareSource: Tech Crunch | December 10, 2013
- Soundwave Plugs Into YouTube To Let You Track Listening Habits On Freetard Music Service Of ChoiceSource: Tech Crunch | December 10, 2013
- Linux Foundation, Host of Consumer Electronics Firms Line Up Behind New "Internet of Things" StandardSource: All Things D | December 10, 2013
- PaeDae Raises $11.6M, Looks Beyond Mobile Rewards To “User-Centric Advertising”
Trending ArticlesAt a highly appropriate venue – a Google Plus hangout – two Republican... more »December 5, 2013 6:00 amThe 5-day shopping period from Thanksgiving Thursday through Cyber Monday has broken records... more »December 4, 2013 6:00 am